|
Evaluation
Criteria
Exemplary
- Questions
Discussion postings include thought-provoking questions designed to
elicit responses from other participants.
- Postings
Discussion postings clearly indicate understanding of course readings
and are completed before the deadline, meet or exceed the minimum
number required, and are straight to the point, clearly worded, and
respond constructively to others' ideas. Responses are posted to postings/questions
of other participants and enhance the class discussion.
Proficient
- Questions
Discussion postings include questions that move beyond yes or no answers,
and elicit responses from one other participant.
- Postings
Discussion postings are timely, relevant and include some feedback
about the readings and responses to others' comments in the discussions.
Meets the minimum number of postings per week.
Partially Proficient
- Questions
Discussion postings include questions that do not move beyond yes
or no answers, and fail to elicit responses from other participants.
- Postings
Discussion postings are too few in number, or too trivial to fully
meet the requirement. For example, most of the postings are "I think
so too" or "I disagree", but lack any argument that adds to the discussion;
or there is excessive quoting from the material without any real supporting
evidence of how the topic might integrate with their classroom teaching.
Incomplete
- Questions
Discussion postings include unclear questions that do not move beyond
yes or no answers and/or fail to respond to classmates' postings.
- Postings
Discussion postings are below the minimum required two postings per
week or contributions are merely perfunctory. For example, most of
the postings are "I think so too" or "I disagree", but lack any argument
that adds to the discussion, or there is excessive quoting from the
readings without any real supporting evidence of the topic.
Evaluation Scale
A - Exemplary
B - Proficient
Partially Proficient and Incomplete need to be resubmitted.
|
|
